<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Alternatives, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Observations, Ideas and Tips from a Life in Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiscerningPhotog</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>DiscerningPhotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-5150</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not familiar with the email issue you describe. Not sure whether that&#039;s a PSE issue or an AOL issue.
I&#039;m afraid your crashing issues could be Win related. I finally switched back to Macs for video
editing because the platform is so much, much more stable for that process than what I was using on the PC side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with the email issue you describe. Not sure whether that&#8217;s a PSE issue or an AOL issue.<br />
I&#8217;m afraid your crashing issues could be Win related. I finally switched back to Macs for video<br />
editing because the platform is so much, much more stable for that process than what I was using on the PC side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Dunaway</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-5147</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Dunaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-5147</guid>
		<description>The reason I&#039;m looking at your post is that I&#039;ve been using PSE since v.2.0 (I&#039;m now on 8.0 on Win7x84) and though I like the program,  I&#039;m tired of wrestling with frustrating problems.  
- PSE crashes way too often, especially if I leave it open for a couple of hours without input.
- It&#039;s extremely difficult to email pix via AOL.  It &#039;forgets&#039; email addresses I&#039;ve entered so I have to re-enter them, and is generally very hard to use for email.
- I can&#039;t see videos in PSE.  Sometimes it will show a few frames and then goes black.  This is a new trick since I got 8.0.
Are there solutions to these problems, or do I need to change?  Is there a PSE version that addresses any of these issues?  Free is nice but I don&#039;t mind paying for good software, and none of the three other programs you discuss meets my needs.  
Thanks for your help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I&#8217;m looking at your post is that I&#8217;ve been using PSE since v.2.0 (I&#8217;m now on 8.0 on Win7x84) and though I like the program,  I&#8217;m tired of wrestling with frustrating problems.<br />
- PSE crashes way too often, especially if I leave it open for a couple of hours without input.<br />
- It&#8217;s extremely difficult to email pix via AOL.  It &#8216;forgets&#8217; email addresses I&#8217;ve entered so I have to re-enter them, and is generally very hard to use for email.<br />
- I can&#8217;t see videos in PSE.  Sometimes it will show a few frames and then goes black.  This is a new trick since I got 8.0.<br />
Are there solutions to these problems, or do I need to change?  Is there a PSE version that addresses any of these issues?  Free is nice but I don&#8217;t mind paying for good software, and none of the three other programs you discuss meets my needs.<br />
Thanks for your help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3176</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-3176</guid>
		<description>No matter how many times I try another alternative, I constantly find myself back at Photoshop. I just wish it was more intuitive. Maybe Apple can give them an overhaul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how many times I try another alternative, I constantly find myself back at Photoshop. I just wish it was more intuitive. Maybe Apple can give them an overhaul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merrill</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2440</link>
		<dc:creator>Merrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 21:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-2440</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Photoshop Elements for years. It was actually free software included with a scanner I purchased. I was excited at the time because I figured eventually I would move on to Photoshop and Elements would give me a nice head start on what I heard was software with a large learning curve.

Turns out, I&#039;ve never moved to the full Photoshop. Elements does everything I need. It&#039;s that good. I&#039;m sure that for the hardcore photo editor that Photoshop is needed. But for the vast majority of us, Elements will provide more than enough options.

- M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Photoshop Elements for years. It was actually free software included with a scanner I purchased. I was excited at the time because I figured eventually I would move on to Photoshop and Elements would give me a nice head start on what I heard was software with a large learning curve.</p>
<p>Turns out, I&#8217;ve never moved to the full Photoshop. Elements does everything I need. It&#8217;s that good. I&#8217;m sure that for the hardcore photo editor that Photoshop is needed. But for the vast majority of us, Elements will provide more than enough options.</p>
<p>- M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>Love GIMP but for  real easy jobs I also used paint.net. It&#039;s super easy to use for banners etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love GIMP but for  real easy jobs I also used paint.net. It&#8217;s super easy to use for banners etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>I really dig the look of Photoshop Elements.  Something about the darker backdrop makes editing pictures (and staring at a computer) more comfortable for the eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really dig the look of Photoshop Elements.  Something about the darker backdrop makes editing pictures (and staring at a computer) more comfortable for the eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Kimmel</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Kimmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 04:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been exploring your site for a while, and it&#039;s right up my alley.  I&#039;ve recently been bit by the &#039;shutter bug&#039; and I&#039;ve been learning lots of techniques, mainly on the fly.  You offer a great resource from which to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been exploring your site for a while, and it&#8217;s right up my alley.  I&#8217;ve recently been bit by the &#8216;shutter bug&#8217; and I&#8217;ve been learning lots of techniques, mainly on the fly.  You offer a great resource from which to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiscerningPhotog</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>DiscerningPhotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>Good luck with it, Dennis! You certainly can&#039;t beat the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with it, Dennis! You certainly can&#8217;t beat the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently been looking for something other than Photoshop... Glad I came across your post!  I&#039;m off to go try Gimp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently been looking for something other than Photoshop&#8230; Glad I came across your post!  I&#8217;m off to go try Gimp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdSR</title>
		<link>http://thediscerningphotographer.com/2010/02/18/photoshop-alternatives-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>AdSR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscerningphotographer.com/?p=1326#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>(I know it&#039;s been a year :) )

The Image menu in GIMP is for the entire image - all layers, paths, whatever. If at all, I&#039;d move levels and curves to Layer or Filters. But both these locations have their own meanings. Layer, like Image, is kind of &quot;administrative&quot; for layer properties and handling. Filters is for more complex processing, including scripts (well, that&#039;s the script author&#039;s decision really).

Just so you know, as a GIMP user, I was equally confused by Photoshop interface when I tried it - and being used to GIMP look I didn&#039;t like Photoshop&#039;s looks that much. So this is rather personal. I agree with your comparison to Firefox but GIMP doesn&#039;t have that kind of backing. Regrettably, many worthwhile open source projects don&#039;t have the corporate resources they could use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I know it&#8217;s been a year <img src='http://thediscerningphotographer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>The Image menu in GIMP is for the entire image &#8211; all layers, paths, whatever. If at all, I&#8217;d move levels and curves to Layer or Filters. But both these locations have their own meanings. Layer, like Image, is kind of &#8220;administrative&#8221; for layer properties and handling. Filters is for more complex processing, including scripts (well, that&#8217;s the script author&#8217;s decision really).</p>
<p>Just so you know, as a GIMP user, I was equally confused by Photoshop interface when I tried it &#8211; and being used to GIMP look I didn&#8217;t like Photoshop&#8217;s looks that much. So this is rather personal. I agree with your comparison to Firefox but GIMP doesn&#8217;t have that kind of backing. Regrettably, many worthwhile open source projects don&#8217;t have the corporate resources they could use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

